There are tons of scenes in the book that were nonexistent in the movie-characters that were never even introduced-and menace that was severely missing from the villains. Because of this, the book provides a far grander experience of both characters and settings than the movie the former had only 130 minutes to get the job done, whereas the latter had 481 pages. Also, there are far more places to see in the book versus the movie, which cut down on locations due to the budget and streamlining the story. In the book, you get to experience Jack Reacher’s analysis of the environments, the people, and the events happening around him (especially the ones he causes). Though the movie has the visual elements down-everything from the city, the characters, and the action, there is a significant lack of depth and scale. Think of it as watching those picturesque slideshows while your tv is on pause versus actually going to those places that’s the level of difference that exists between watching the movie and reading the book. If you thought the movie was great, the book is bound to blow you away. No-just because you watched the movie does not mean you already know what will happen! And it’s not just the climactic conclusion I’m talking about. Here, we look at why one book in particular- Jack Reacher: One Shot, by Lee Child-far exceeds the film adaptation and three reasons why its pages are worth diving into.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |